PENGEMBANGAN MODEL IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM MATA KULIAH DESAIN PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN

I Nyoman Sridana, Dadi Setiadi, Sudirman Wilian

Abstract

Abstrak: Implementasi kurikulum di program studi dihadapkan pada sejumlah masalah seperti tidak adanya kaitan anatara capaian pembelajaran mata kuliah dengan capaian pembelajaran program studi dan proses pembelajaran belum sesuai standar proses. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk merestrukturisasi capaian pembelajaran mata kuliah dan mengembangkan model implementasi mata kuliah pengembangan desain program pembelajaran. Jenis  penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskripsi kualitiatif dan kuantitatif, pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara, observasi dan analisis dokumen serta pos tes. Data kualitatif dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif, sedangkan kuantitatif dianalisis secara deskriptif kuantitatif.  Hasil menunjukan bahwa ada kaitan capaian pembelajaran mata kuliah dengan capaian pembelajaran program studi dan Sintaks model pembelajaran hasil pengembangan: pendahuluan, identifikasi masalah studi kasus, rekomendasi solusi, koneksi analisis dan pengembangan, asesmen dan refleksi tindak lanjut. Model pembelajaran meningkatkan kemampuan mahasiswa dalam menganalisis dan mengembangkan model desain pembelajaran dengan nilai mahasiswa mendapat nilai A = 28,6 %, nilai B+ = 71,4 %. Capaian pembelajaran mata kuliah disusun berdasarkan penjabaran tagihan capaian pembelajaran program studi dan model pembelajaran terdiri: pendahuluan, identifikasi masalah studi kasus, rekomendasi solusi, koneksi analisis dan pengembangan, asesmen dan refleksi tindak lanjut serta meningkatkan kemampuan mahasiswa dalam mengembangkan model pembelajaran.

Kata Kuci: desain pembelajaran model implementasi

Abstract: The Curriculum implementation in study program is met on numbers of dilemma such as there is no getting on between subject objectives and goal of study program and learning process is not based on process standard. The aims of this study are to reorganize the learning objectives and develop curriculum implementation model of subject of learning program design development. Research sort use were qualitative and quantitative description. Data collected by interview, observation, document analyzing, posttest and analyzed using qualitative and quantitative description. The results show that there is relation between objective of subject with the learning goal of study program and The syntax of the model of instruction developed are introduction, problem identification in field as case study, recommended solution connected analyze and development, assessment and reflection and follow up. The developed model of instruction can improve student competence in analyzing and develop design model of instruction with 28.6 % high distinction and the rest of distinction 71.4 %. The subject objectives are formulated based on demand of study program goals, Instructional model consist of introduction, problem identification in field as case study, recommended solution connected analyze and development, assessment and reflection and follow up also can improve student competence in developing instructional model.

Keywords: design instruction model implementation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adisendjaja, Y.H. (2008). Analisis Buku Ajar Biologi SMA Kelas X Di Kota Bandung Berdasarkan Literasi Sains. [Online] Tersedia: www.file.upi.edu/.../ PENELITI AN _ANALISIS_ BUKU. [2 Februari 2014].

Bybee et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness. Colorado : Office of Science Education National Institutes of Health.

Bybee, R.W. (2009). The BSCS 5E Instrcutional Model and 21ST Century Skills. A Workshop Paper on Exploring the Intersection of Science Education and the Development of 21st Century Skills. [Online]. Tersedia http://www.performancexpress.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/PFI47 _4_25.pdf. [15 Desember 2012].

Deggs, D. (2009). Using Reflection To Evaluate Course Outcome. Journal of College Teaching & Learning. Vol. 6, (2), 41-48.

Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan (2014). Buku Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan TinggiKementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Dunkin, M.J. & Biddle, B.J. (1974). The Study of Teaching. New York : Holt Rixehorf and Wiston Inc.

Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E Model. The Science Teacher, 70, (6), 56-59.

Harris, C.J. & Rooks, D.L (2010). Managing Inquiry-Based Science: Challenges in Enacting Complex Science Instruction in Elementary and Middle School Classrooms. J Sci Teacher Educ 21:227–240.

Karagiorgi, Y. & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating Constructivism into Instructional Design: Potential and Limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8, (1), 17-27.

Larrivee B & Cooper, J.M. (2006). An Educator’s Guide to Teacher Reflection. USA: Cengage Learning. [Online] Tersedia: http://cengagesites.com/academic/assets/sites/4004/ Education%20Modules/ gd%20to%20teach%20refl.pdf . [2 Desember 2014].

Mezirow, J. (1998). On Critical Reflection. Adult Education Quarterly 48 (3). 185-198.

Oliva, P.F. (1992) Developing the Curriculum, New York, HarperCollins Publisher.

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia.

Print, M. (1993). Curriculum Development and Design (2nd Edition). St Leonards : Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.

Reed J. & Koliba, C. (2003). Facilitating Reflection A Manual for Leaders and Educators. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.uvm.edu/~dewey/ reflection_manual/index.html. [2 Desember 2012].

Richards, J.C. (1990). Towards Reflective Teaching. [Online] Tersedia: http://www.tttjournal.co.uk. [2 Desember 2012].

Sugiyono. (2008b). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan RT & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No 12 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perguruan Tinggi.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.