Integrating Hybrid Learning, YouTube Tutorials, and AI Tools to Enhance Student Engagement and Achievement in Introductory Physics: A Mixed-Methods Study in Mathematics Education

Muhammad  Taufik; Syahrial A

doi:10.29303/jipp.v10i2.3634

Integrating Hybrid Learning, YouTube Tutorials, and AI Tools to Enhance Student Engagement and Achievement in Introductory Physics: A Mixed-Methods Study in Mathematics Education

Authors

Muhammad Taufik , Syahrial A

DOI:

10.29303/jipp.v10i2.3634

Published:

2025-05-31

Issue:

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Mei

Keywords:

Hybrid learning, Artificial intelligence in education, YouTube tutorials, Introductory physics, Student engagement, Mathematics education, Mixed-methods research, Digital learning tools

Articles

Downloads

pdf

How to Cite

Taufik, M. ., & A, S. (2025). Integrating Hybrid Learning, YouTube Tutorials, and AI Tools to Enhance Student Engagement and Achievement in Introductory Physics: A Mixed-Methods Study in Mathematics Education. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 10(2), 1953–1957. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v10i2.3634

Download Citation

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of integrating hybrid learning, YouTube tutorials, and artificial intelligence (AI) tools in improving student engagement and academic performance in an introductory physics course for second-semester mathematics education students. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative data from pre- and post-tests, usage logs of YouTube and AI platforms, and class participation records, along with qualitative insights from student feedback. Descriptive statistics and inferential analyses reveal a significant improvement in post-test scores, with an average increase of 9 points (from 70.2 to 79.4), indicating the positive impact of the digital learning interventions. Students’ engagement, particularly measured through their interaction with AI-based personalized feedback and video tutorials, correlated strongly with learning outcomes. The findings suggest that leveraging hybrid learning environment supported by visual and adaptive tools can foster deeper understanding of abstract physics concepts and promote active participation.

References

Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.011

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.

Meltzer, D. E., & Thornton, R. K. (2012). Resource Letter ALIP–1: Active-Learning Instruction in Physics. American Journal of Physics, 80(6), 478–496. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4724297

Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9446-0

Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite. Wiley.

Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Integrating Hybrid Learning, YouTube Tutorials, and AI Tools to Enhance Student Engagement and Achievement in Introductory Physics: A Mixed-Methods Study in Mathematics Education

Authors

DOI:

Published:

Issue:

Keywords:

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Abstract

References

License

Information

Developed By

Official Website Of

Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, Universitas Mataram

Contact Us

Official link

Share & Follow