Status Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) Sebagai Ilmu Pengetahuan, Sebuah Tinjauan Epistemologis
DOI:
10.29303/jipp.v8i1b.1134Published:
2023-04-05Downloads
Abstract
Salah satu persoalan dalam penerapan metode saintifik (scientific method) dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) adalah terkait dengan isu epistemologi keilmuan. PAI dianggap lebih bersifat keimanan (belief) ketimbang fakta empirik yang menjadi lokus penerapan penerapan metode saintifik. Sebagian ahli dan praktisi pendidikan, termasuk pendidikan Islam, memandang bahwa penerapan metode saintifik dalam pembelajaran PAI tidak relevan dan bisa menimbulkan persoalan. Tulisa ini coba menunjukkan bahwa PAI memiliki basis epistemologis yang kuat dan memenuhi semua syarat sebagai ilmu pengetahuan. Kriteria-kriteria ilmiah sebuah ilmu seperti disodorkan Mannheim (1954), Gadamer (1990), dan Prunckun (2010) terpenuhi secara utuh. Lebih jauh tulisan ini juga coba menganalisa dimensi-dimensi pengetahuan PAI dalam perspektif taksonomi Bloom (1955; Anderson, 2001) yang menjadi rujukan utama pengembangan kurikulum nasional pada semua mata pelajaran termasuk PAI.
Keywords:
epistemologi, metode saintifik, PAI, taksonomi Bloom.References
Aden, R. (2013). Religion today: A critical approach to religious study. Maryland: Rowman & Litlefield Publish, Inc.
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R,. Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C., eds. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Rivison of Bloom’s Taxonomi of Educational Objectives, Abriged Edition. New York: Logman.
Ansary, Tamim (2010). Destiny Disrupted: A History of the World Trough Islamic Eyes. New York: Public Affairs.
Attas, Al-. S.M.N. (1980). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. Kuala Lumpur: Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia.
Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Clasification of Educational Goals, Handbook 1 Cognitive Domain. London: Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd.
Boyle, H. N. (2006). “Memorization and learning in islamic school.” Comparative Education Review, 50(3), h. 478-495. Diakses: 27/02/2014 05:47
Burhanudin, J. & Dijk, K. (2013). Islam in Indonesia: Contrasting Image and Interpretations. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (1990). Truth and method: Elements of a philosophy hermeneutics, Revised Edition. Translation revised by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Mar. Crossroad: New York.
George, M.W. (2008) The Elements of Library Research. What Every Student Needs to Know. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton Unversity Press.
Hafes, R. (2021). “Religious education,” dalam Alka Sehgal Cuthbert and Alex Standish (eds.), What should schools teach?: Disciplines, subjects and the pursuit of truth. London: UCL Press. Accessed March 20, 2021. Doi:10.2307/j.ctv14t475s.
Halstead, J. M. (2004). “An Islamic concept of education,” Comparative Education, 40(4), h. 517-529.
Hardiman, F.B. (2003). Melampaui positivisme dan modernitas: Diskursus filosofis tentang metode ilmiah dan problem modernitas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Hitti, P. K. (2005). History of the Arabs: Rujukan Induk Paling Otoritatif tentang Sejarah Peradaban Islam. Jakarta: Serambi Ilmu Semesta.
Hurley, A. (2013). “An education fundamentalism? Let’s them eat the data.” Ohio Valley Philosophy of Education Society.
Ilechukwu, L. C. (2014) “Introducing critical thinking in religious education classroom.” Journal of Education and Practice, 5(9), 14.
Islam, SK. F. (2016). The contribution of Syed Ali Ashraf, Syed Naquib al-Attas, and Ismail Raji al-Faruqui to islamization of knowledge. Dhaka: Departemen of Islamic Studies, University of Dhaka.
Kemendikbud (Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan) (2018). Buku pegangan pembelajaran berorientasi pada keterampilan beripikir tingkat tinggi: Progam peningkatan kompetensi pembelajaran berbasis zonasi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Kertanegara, M. (2014). Essentials of Islamic epistemology: A philosophical inquiry into the foundations of knowledge. Bandar Sri Begawan: Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
Khadduri, M. (2011). Translation of al-Shafi’i’s Risala – Treatise on the Foundation of Islamic Jurisprudence. England: Islamic Text Society.
Khalediy, al-. K. (2011). “Education and methods of teaching in Islam in the era of Az-Zarnooji.” Al-Mujtama’, 4(3).
Mahzar, A. (1993). Islam masa depan. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka.
Mannheim, K. (1954). Ideology and utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. Terj. Louis Wirth dan Edward Shils. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Maraghi, al-, A.M. (1946) Tafsir al-Maraghi, Juz VI. Mesir: Shirkah Maktabah wa Mat ba’ah Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi wa Auladuh.
Media, S.V. (2002). Teacher’s guide: The scientific method, grades 6-10. New York: Division of Global Media.
Nata, A (2015) Studi Islam Komprehensif, Cet. II. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Pilikian, H. (2021). “The scientific method in religion.” Garden of Eden. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_H0pLsgAYc. Diakses, 20 Maret 2021, 20:23.
Prunckun, H. (2010). Handbook of Scientific Methods of Inquiry for Intelligence Analysis. Toronto: The Scarecrow Press
Qadumi, al-. M. (2002). “Daur ibn al-Haitham fi al-Bahth al-‘Ilmi” Jami’ah al-Najah li al-Abhath al-‘Ulum al-Insaniyyah, 16(1).
Qomar, M. (2005). Epistemologi pendidikan Islam dari metode rasional hingga metode kritik. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Sardar, Z (2006). How do you know? Reading Ziauddin Sardar on Islam, science and cultural relations. Ed. Ehsan Masood. London: Pluto Press.
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah (2021). Pedoman penulisan tesis dan disertasi program magister dan doctor. Jakarta: Sekolah Pascasarja UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jamaludin Jamaludin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
klik di sini 
