Assessment Quality in Mathematics Learning: An Analysis of Critical Thinking Instruments for Derivative Topics
DOI:
10.29303/jipp.v10i1.3087Published:
2025-02-28Downloads
Abstract
The assessment of students' critical thinking abilities is crucial for the learning process; however, numerous educators have been unable to select high-quality evaluation tools. A question that is effective must satisfy the following criteria: adequate validity, reliability, difficulty level, differentiating power, and effectiveness of the checker. A quantitative approach was employed in this study, which employed descriptive methods in one of the high schools in Yogyakarta. 15 summative test items on derivative material were administered to 30 students as the research subjects. The question is declared valid, as the content validity results using V-Aiken's indicate a value of 0.8889. This value is classified as high. The reliability test yielded a value of 0.924 for choice questions and 0.777 for description questions, suggesting that the questions were reliable. The analysis of the items revealed that item number 6 required deletion due to its low differential power, while item number 7 required revision. Questions 10 and 12 should be addressed in accordance with the level of difficulty. The exemptions are ineffective, necessitating revision of the answer options in question numbers 9 and 10. This research underscores the significance of enhancing evaluation instruments to facilitate the attainment of student learning indicators.
Keywords:
Critical Thinking, Item Analysis, Reliability, Validity.References
Ali Hamzah (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta:PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Ardhani, Y. (2020). Kualitas Butir Soal SMK Muhammadiyah Gamping. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif, 3(1).
Arikunto, S. (2015). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua Cetakan keempat. PT. Bumi Aksara.
Asmawi Zainul dan Noehi Nasoetion. 1997. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Pusat Antar Universitas, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi: Departemen Pendidikan Dan kebudayaan. Dali, S Naga. 1992. Pengantar Teori Sekor Pada Pengukuran Pendidikan. Gunadarma: Jakarta
Astuti. 2020. “Analisis Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Genap Mata Pelajaran Matematika Siswa SD Negeri 005 Binuang.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 4(8), 67- 80.
Bagiono. (2017). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran dan The Analysis of Difficulty Level and Discrimination Power of Test Items of Radiography Level 1 Examination. Widyanuklida, 16(1), 112.
Bernard, M. 2015. Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Penalaran Serta Disposisi Matematik Siswa SMK dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual Melalui Game Adobe Flash CS 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung. Vol.4.No.2.
Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. 1997. Manual Item And Test Analysis (Iteman). Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sistem Pengujian
Depdiknas. 2008. Panduan Analisis Butir Soal
Ennis, R. (2009). Crytical Thinking. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Haq, V. A. (2022). Menguji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Pada Mata Pelajaran Al Qur’an Hadits Menggunakan Korelasi Produk Momenspearman Brown. An-Nawa: Jurnal Studi Islam, 4(1), 11-24.
Herawati, I. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Hots Untuk Mengukur Dimensi Pengetahuan Fisika Siswa Kelas Xi Sman 14 Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Pendidikan Taman Widya Humaniora, 1(3), 299–323
Hidayah, F. N., Kusumaningsih, W., & Prasetyowati, D. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sma Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(5), 329-338.
Mandini, G. W., & Hartono, H. (2018). Analisis kemampuan menyelesaikan soal HOTS model TIMSS dan kepercayaan diri siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v13i2.21234
Miller, K. (2009). Organizational Communication: Approaches and Process (5 ed.). Canada: Cengage Learning.
Novianti, S., Silalahi NF, Y., Fadiyah H, F., Jamaluddin Ujang, & Setiawan, S. (2023). Analisis Pentingnya Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis TerhadapPembelajaran Bagi Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(20), 664–669.
Nufus, H., & Kusaeri, A. (2020). Analisis Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri.
Nurmalia, N. R., & Sari, C. K. (2023). Kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam memecahkan masalah HOTS. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 6(5), 2053–2064. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i5.19342
Palinussa, A. L. (2013). Students’ critical mathematical thinking skills and character: experiments for junior high school students through realistic mathematics education culture-based. IndoMS. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 75-94.
Revita, R., Kurniati, A., Andriani, L., Tarbiyah, F., Keguruan, D., & Riau, K. (2018). Analisis Instrumen Tes Akhir Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Untuk Siswa Smp Pada Materi Fungsi Dan Relasi. 2(2), 8–19.
Roudlo, M. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom dengan Pendekatan STEM.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA CV.
Sundari, P. D., & Sarkity, D. (2021). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 4(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v4i2.11445
Susilawati, E., Agustinasari, A., Samsudin, A., & Siahaan, P. (2020). Analisis Tingkat Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i1.145
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurul Amini, Elly Arliani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
klik di sini 
