Exploring the Learning Design on Learning Management System for Online Learning: A Case Study in Higher Education
Penulis
Wahyuddin Rauf , Abd. Rajab , Nashruddin NashruddinDOI:
10.29303/jipp.v8i1.1075Diterbitkan:
2023-01-22Terbitan:
Vol 8 No 1 (2023): FebruariKata Kunci:
Higher Education, LMS, Learning Design, Online Learning.Articles
##submission.downloads##
Cara Mengutip
Abstrak
E-learning has become a popular tool among 21st-century learners as the importance of lifelong learning has grown. However, most teachers find converting teaching and learning from face-to-face to online learning difficult. Current e-learning theories and practices are neither straightforward nor consistent, implying that this solution is implemented irregularly, arbitrarily, and with various degrees of success. Therefore, this study aims to discuss the Exploring the Learning Design on Learning Management System for Online Learning: A Case Study in Higher Education. This research's specific purposes are to determine how higher education teachers design their courses using LMS in an online teaching context. This research applied a qualitative approach with a case study to explore the implementation of the teaching approaches, methods, or strategies. Using purposive sampling, two lecturers who have been nominated in Online Learning System (SPADA) Award 2021 online were invited to participate as the subjects in this research. The data were gathered through interviews with open-ended questions developed by the researchers in data collection. The findings of this research show that the learning design on LMS basically can be done by stating the learning objectives. The well-defined learning objective plays vital roles since it determines the selection of activity and the learning content. Selecting learning activity, as the next phase, can be done by presenting blend materials such as text, audio, and interactive video. Providing a low-risk exercise after presenting the material is also important since it provides practice opportunities for students. The last phase is assessing the student’s performance. This activity, obviously, aims to evaluate the learning objective. So, the type of assessment, whether summative or formative, should be selected based on the learning objectives. It is important also to note that assessment may go hand-in-hand with its feedback, and the findings show that LMS enables us to apply immediate feedback for the students.
Referensi
Alfadly, A. (2013). The Efficiency of the “Learning Management System (LMS)†in AOU, Kuwait, as a Communication Tool in an Eâ€learning system. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541311297577
AlYahmady, H. H., & Al Abri, S. S. (2013). Using Nvivo for Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 2(2), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.12816/0002914
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Cognitive Domain.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
Campbell, N. (2001). Columbia Encyclopedia 6th edition. Reference Reviews.
Cavus, N. (2015). Distance learning and learning management systems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 872–877.
Cavus, N., & Zabadi, T. (2014). A Comparison of Open Source Learning Management Systems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 521–526.
Chapman, L., Masters, J., & Pedulla, J. (2010). Do Digital Divisions Still Persist in Schools? Access to Technology and Technical Skills of Teachers in High Needs Schools in the United States of America. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(2), 239–249.
Cheng, Y. (2012). Effects of quality antecedents on eâ€learning acceptance. Internet Research, 22(3), 361–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211235699
Chipps, J., Kerr, J., Brysiewicz, P., & Walters, F. (2015). A survey of university students’ perceptions of learning management systems in a low-resource setting using a technology acceptance model. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 33(2), 71–77.
Cohen, L., Lawrence, M., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research Methods in Education. In Research Methods in Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720967
Ellis, R. K. (2009). Field Guide to Learning Management Systems. ASTD Learning Circuits, 1–8.
Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of Instructional Design (5th editio). Thomson/Wadsworth. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DxgiAQAAIAAJ
Hartley, R., Kinshuk, Koper, R., Okamoto, T., & Spector, J. M. (2010). The education and training of learning technologists: A competences approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 206–216. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.2.206
Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2019). Educational Technology a Primer for the 21st century (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6643-7
Islam, A. K. M. N., & Azad, N. (2015a). Satisfaction and continuance with a learning management system: Comparing perceptions of educators and students. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology.
Islam, A. K. M. N., & Azad, N. (2015b). Satisfaction and Continuance with a Learning Management System. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 32(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-09-2014-0020
Ivanović, M., Milićević, A. K., Aleksić, V., Bratić, B., & Mandić, M. (2018). Experiences and Perspectives of Technology-Enhanced Learning and Teaching in Higher Education - Serbian Case. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procS.2018.08.086
Kasworm, C. (2011). The Influence of the Knowledge Society: Trends in Adult Higher Education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59(2), 104–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2011.568830
Khadjooi, K., Rostami, K., & Ishaq, S. (2011). How to Use Gagne’s Model of Instructional Design in Teaching Psychomotor Skills. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench, 4(3), 116–119. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017416/
Marketsandmarkets.com. (2016). Learning Management System (LMS) Market by Component (Solutions and Services), Delivery Mode (Distance Learning, Instructor-led Training, and Blended Learning), Deployment, User Type (Academic and Corporate), and Region - Global Forecast to 2026. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/learning-management-systems-market-1266.html
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (The Fourth). SAGE Publications.
Poulova, P., Simonova, I., & Manenova, M. (2015). Which one, or another? Comparative Analysis of Selected LMS. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1302–1308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.052
Skinner, B. F. (1965). Science and Human Behavior (Issue 92904). Simon and Schuster.
Spector, J. M. (2015). Foundations of Educational Technology: Integrative Approaches and Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764269
Turbill, J. (2015). Transformation of Traditional Face-to-Face Teaching to Mobile Teaching and Learning: Pedagogical Perspectives. Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54146-9_54
Turney, C. S. M., Robinson, D., Lee, M., & Soutar, A. (2009). Using Technology to Direct Learning in Higher Education: The way forward? Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408100196
Valentine, K. D., & Kopcha, T. J. (2013). Conducting Educational Design Research. In Educational Media International (Vol. 50, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2013.843832
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The Collected Works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Walker, D. S., Lindner, J. R., Murphrey, T. P., & Dooley, K. (2016). Learning management system usage. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(2), 41–50.
Zaharias, P., & Pappas, C. (2016). Quality Management of Learning Management Systems: A User Experience Perspective. Current Issues in Emerging ELearning, 3(1), 60–83. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol3/iss1/5