The Analysis of Concept Mastering and Creative Thinking Skills of Prospective Physics Teachers Post-Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Penulis
Ahmad Busyairi , Muhammad Zuhdi , Muh. MakhrusDOI:
10.29303/jipp.v7i4b.958Diterbitkan:
2022-12-06Terbitan:
Vol 7 No 4b (2022): DesemberKata Kunci:
Creative Thinking, Mastery of Concepts, Prospective Physics Teacher, Online Learning.Articles
##submission.downloads##
Cara Mengutip
Abstrak
The current era of globalization and technology confronts humans with new challenges and increasingly complex problems. Mastery of concepts and creative thinking skills are two of several competencies that must be possessed by almost all professions at this time. This study aims to determine the extent of mastery of concepts and creative thinking skills of prospective physics teachers on dynamic electricity. This research is descriptive researcher. The population of this study was 60 prospective physics teachers who were studying at the University of Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. The number of samples used was 28 students who were taken using a simple random sampling technique. The instrument consists of cognitive tests at levels C1-C3 in the form of multiple choice and tests of creative thinking skills in the form of real-world problems that are open-ended so that they can allow students to provide many solutions to the problems given. There are four aspects of creative thinking skills used in this study, namely; fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The research data showed that 85.71% of students were able to correctly answer C1 cognitive level questions (remembering), 67.86% of students were able to solve C2 cognitive level questions (understanding), and 60.71% of students were able to solve questions C3 cognitive level questions (applying). Furthermore, for creative thinking skills, the fluency aspect is in the Moderate category with a score of 1.86, and flexibility is in the Low category with a score of 1.14. For aspects of Originality and Elaboration, students are included in the non-creative category with a score of 0.18 and 0.56.
Referensi
Anwar, M., N. M., Aness, M., Khizar, A., Naseer, M., & Gulam, M. (2012). Relationship of Creative Thinking with the Academic Achievements of Secondary School Students. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1 (3), 44-47. Retrieved from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://iijoe.org/v1/IIJE_01_03_12.pdf
Arvyati, Ibrahim, M., & Irawan, A. (2015). Effectivity of Peer Tutoring Learning to Increase Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Class XI IPA SMAN 3 Kediri 2014. International Journal of Education and Research, 3 (1), 613-628. Retrieved from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ijern.com/journal/2015/January-2015/51.pdf
Cahyani, A., Listiana, I.D., & Larasati, S.P.D., (2020). Motivasi Belajar Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. IQ (Ilmu Al-qur’an): Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3 (1), 123-140. Doi: https://doi.org/10.37542/iq.v3i01.57
CCSS ELA, A. (2013). Creativity & Innovation Rubric (California: Buck Institute for Education). Retrieved from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://learningisopen.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FreeBIEs_9-12_Creativity__Innovation_Rubric_CCSS.pdf
Cendra, R., Gazali, N., & Solihin., (2020). E-Learning Dalam Persepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Jasmani. Journal Sport Area, 5 (1), 97–105. Doi: https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2020.vol5(1 ).4721
Chan, D. W. (2007). Creative Teaching in Hong Kong Schools: Constraints and Challenges. Hong Kong Educational Research Journal, 22 (1): 1-11. Retrieved from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.hkier.cuhk.edu.hk/journal/document/ERJ/erj_v22n1_1-12.pdf
Clegg, B. & Brich, P. (2006). Instan Creativity: 76 Cara Instan Meningkatkan Kreativitas. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Gulistan, A.M.S., Siraj, S., Nordin, A.B. & Amedy, S.O. (2015). Teaching Strategies For Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills: A Case Of Secondary Science Teachers. Malaysian Online Journal Of Educational (MOJEM): 3 (4), 16-30. . Retrieved from: https://mojem.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJEM/article/view/6077
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Fokialis, P. & Kabouropoulou, M. (2012). Thinking about creativity in science education. Scientific Research, 3 (5), 603-611. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.3508
Hamdarini, O.I., (2020). Pembelajaran Daring Sebagai Upaya Study From Home (SFH) Selama Pandemi Covid 19. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 8 (3), 496-503. Doi: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v8n3.p496-503
Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. D., Md Yunos, J., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. & Mohamad, M. M. (2011). The Level Of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social and Humanity, 1 (2): 121-125. Retrieved from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://www.ijssh.org/papers/20-H009.pdf
Isaksen, S. G. (1995). On the conceptual foundations of creative problem solving. a response to magyary beck. Creative of Inovation Managemen, 4 (1), 1628–1635. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.1995.tb00202.x
Jones, & Zanker, N. P. (2013). Applying laser cutting techniques through horology for teaching effective STEM in design and technology. Design and Technology Education, 18 (3), 21–34. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1119599
Kusuma, Y. (2010). Creative Problem Solving. Tanggerang: Rumah Pengetahuan.
Michalko, M. (2012). Pemikiran Pemikir Kreatif. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.
Okpara, D. F. (2007). The Value of Creativity and Innovation in Entrepreneurship. Journal of Asia Enterpreneurship and Sustainibility, 3 (2), Retrieved from: http://www.asiaentrepreneurshipjournal.com/AJ ESIII2Okpara.pdf , diakses tanggal 28 Juni 2016.
Safilu (2010). Hakekat dan Stretegi Pembelajaran Biologi untuk Memberdayakan Keterampilan Berpikir Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 2 (1): 1-11. Retrieved from: http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jpb/article/view/3851
Salih, M. (2010). Developing Thinking Skills in Malaysian Science Students Via An Analogical Task. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33 (1): 110-128. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ910946
Setyoningrum, A., Rahmasari, F., Zulfinanda, U., & Safitri, P.T. (2021). Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Online Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Gammath, 6 (1), 40-46, http://jurnal.unmuhjember.ac.id/index.php/JPM/article/view/5396/pdf
Silver dan Edward A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and thinking in problem posing. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29 (3), 75-80. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
Simbolon, H. Simbolon, M. R., & Harahap, F. (2019). An Analysis of Students’ Scientific Literacy Skillsin State Senior High Schools throughout Central Tapanuli District. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 384, 105-109. Retrieved from: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/aisteel-19/125928346
Treffinger, D. J. Young, G.C., Sheparson, C., & Selby, E., (2002). Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. Florida: Center for Creative Learning Sarasota.
Treffinger, J. T., Isaksen, S. G. dan Dorval, B. S. (2006). Creative problem Solving. Texas: Prufrock Press Inc
Turkmen, H. (2015). Creative Thinking Skills Analyzes of Vocational High School Students. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studes in the World, 5 (1): 74-84. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/21546835/Creative_Thinking_Skills_Analyzes_Of_Vocational_High_School_Students
Verawati, Y., Supriatna, A., Wahyu, W. & Setiaji, B. (2019). Identification of student’s collaborative skills in learning salt hydrolysis through sharing and jumping task design. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE), Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-5. Retrieved from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042058
Wang, C. W. & Horng, R. Y. (2002). The effects of creative problem solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R & D performance. The Journal of Research, Technology and Iinnovation Management, 32 (1), 35-45. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00237