Pengaruh Pemberdayaan Psikologis dalam Meningktkan Kreativitas Guru dalam Pembelajaran
(Studi Empirik Pada Guru di Kota Ambon)
DOI:
10.29303/jipp.v7i3.638Published:
2022-07-22Downloads
Abstract
Guru yang kreatif sangat dibutuhkan untuk memungkinkan terjadinya inovasi dalam proses pengembangan pembelajaran yang efektif dan efisien. Khususnya dimasa era Revolusi Industri 4.0, para guru ditunut untuk dapat mengembangkan diri dari aspek professional maupun pedagogis untuk dapat meningkatkan efektifitas pengajaran terhadap siswa. Hal ini menuntut kreativitas guru dalam pengajaran sehinggga dapat mengembangkan kreativitas siswa untuk mengembangkan potensi dirinya. Tujuan dari penelitian  ini adalah untuk menguji pengaruh pemberdayaan psikologis guru sebagai aspek motivasi aktif dalam pengembangan kreativitas Guru yang berada di kota Ambon. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan menggunakan metode survey kuesioner untuk mengumpulkan data penelitian. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan model persamaan structural (SEM) dengan menggunakan program AMOS 24. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemberdayaan psikologis berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kreativitas guru dalam pengajaran. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa untuk dapat menciptakan dan meningkatkan kreativitas guru dalam pengajaran maka guru perlu untuk diberdayakan secara psikologis.
Keywords:
Dampak (Impact), Kompetensi (Competence), Kreativitas Guru, Makna (Meaning), Penentuan nasib sendiri (Self-Deterrmination), Pemberdayaan Psikologis.References
Arifani, Y., & Suryanti, S. (2019). The Influence of Male and Female ESP Teachers' Creativity toward Learners' Involvement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 237-250.
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457.
Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British journal of educational studies, 51(2), 113-127.
Elaldi, S., & Batdi, V. (2016). Comparing Effects of Different Applications on Pre-Service Teachers: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(7), 70-81.
El-Sayed, S. H., El-Zeiny, H. H. A., & Adeyemo, D. A. (2014). Relationship between occupational stress, emotional intelligence, and self-efficacy among faculty members in faculty of nursing Zagazig University, Egypt. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 4(4), 183.
Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250-267.
Ghozali, I. (2017). MODEL PERSAMAAN STRUKTURAL: Konsep Dan Aplikasi Dengan Program AMOS 24 Update Bayesian SEM Edisi 7 (7 ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of management, 30(4), 453-470.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis 7/e (seven ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hirsto, L., Lampinen, M., & Syrjäkari, M. (2013). Learning outcomes of university lecturers from a process-oriented university pedagogical course. Trames: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(4), 347.
Jordan, G., MigliÄ, G., Todorović, I., & MariÄ, M. (2017). Psychological empowerment, job satisfaction and organizational commitment among lecturers in higher education: comparison of six CEE countries. Organizacija, 50(1), 17-32.
Jules, T., & Sundberg, K. C. (2018). The internationalization of creativity as a learning competence. Global Education Review, 5(1), 35-51.
Khodabakhshzadeh, H., Hosseinnia, M., Moghadam, H. A., & Ahmadi, F. (2018). EFL Teachers' Creativity and Their Teaching's Effectiveness: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 227-238.
Paek, S. H., & Sumners, S. E. (2019). The indirect effect of teachers’ creative mindsets on teaching creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(3), 298-311.
Patston, T. J., Cropley, D. H., Marrone, R. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Teacher implicit beliefs of creativity: Is there an arts bias? Teaching and teacher education, 75, 366-374.
Rasulzada, F., & Dackert, I. (2009). Organizational creativity and innovation in relation to psychological well-being and organizational factors. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2-3), 191-198.
Rubenstein, L. D., McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2013). Teaching for creativity scales: An instrument to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 324-334.
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity research journal, 24(1), 92-96.
Shapira-Lishchinsky, O., & Tsemach, S. (2014). Psychological empowerment as a mediator between teachers’ perceptions of authentic leadership and their withdrawal and citizenship behaviors. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 675-712.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive†model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681.
Vedenpää, I., & Lonka, K. (2014). Teachers’ and teacher students’ conceptions of learning and creativity. Creative Education, 5(20), 1821.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
klik di sini 
