Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset, dan Media CTP Pada Pembelajaran Sains: Upaya Mengembangkan Keterampilan Menulis Ilmiah Mahasiswa
DOI:
10.29303/jipp.v10i4.4171Published:
2025-11-27Downloads
Abstract
The results of the paper quality assessment show that students' writing skills are still relatively low. This fact is that the number of learning facilities is directly proportional to the writing skills that can be achieved by students. The goal is to analyze the quality of students' science research papers through the implementation of these learning facilities. This pre-experiment research will be conducted on students of PGSD Study Program, FKIP, Mataram University. The sample size is determined by purposive sampling. To obtain data, paper documents are assessed using an assessment rubric. There are a total of 23 indicators that are used as a reference to get a score. The scores obtained from these activities are converted into scores that range from 0 - 100. To get an overview of student skills, data analysis using descriptive statistics was conducted. This includes averages and proportions/percentages. As for comparing the effectiveness of the treatment on. The results of the study show that the degree of mastery of students in writing papers is at a quantitative value of 83.47. This quantitative value has an A grade. In addition, the median of the quantitative data is 83.18. This indicates that at least 50% of students have excellent writing skills. The mode value is even higher at 85.00 with a proportion of 29%. Comparative analysis shows a significant difference with p < 0.05, reinforcing the effectiveness of the PBR model combined with learning media. The t-value, ranging from 9.761 to 25.657, indicates that the difference is highly significant and not coincidental. From this data, it can be concluded that the implementation of the PBR model assisted by CTP media is effective in developing the scientific writing skills of PGSD students.
Keywords:
scientific papers, university students, writing skills.References
Afridona, S., Yulhendri, & Syofyan, E. (2019). Research Based Learning Model Implementation and Its Impact on Scientific Writing Ability (An Experiment to Economic Education Students). https://doi.org/10.2991/piceeba-19.2019.28
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bentley, B., & Sieben, R. (2022). Cognitive load theory: An adjunct to constructivist learning theory not an alternative. Australian Educational Leader, 41(1).
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. What the student does (4th Edn.). In Innovations in Education and Teaching International (Vol. 50, Issue 4).
Brew, A., & Jewell, E. (2012). Enhancing quality learning through experiences of research-based learning: implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic, 17(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.586461
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Can, B., Yildiz-Demirtas, V., & Altun, E. (2017). The effect of project- based science education programme on scientific process skills and conceptions of Kindergarten students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 395–413.
Chuang, S. (2021). The Applications of Constructivist Learning Theory and Social Learning Theory on Adult Continuous Development. Performance Improvement, 60(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21963
Cong-Lem, N. (2022). The Relation Between Environment and Psychological Development: Unpacking Vygotsky’s Influential Concept of Perezhivanie. Human Arenas, 5(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00314-6
Elvis Munyaradzi Ganyaupfu. (2013). Teaching methods and students’ academic performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(9), 29–35.
Fernando, S. Y., & Marikar, F. M. (2017). Constructivist Teaching/Learning Theory and Participatory Teaching Methods. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v6n1p110
Frey, B. B. (2022). Visual Display of Quantitative Information. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071812082.n670
Hoff, H. E. (2020). The evolution of intercultural communicative competence: Conceptualisations, critiques and consequences for 21st century classroom practice. Intercultural Communication Education, 3(2), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.29140/ice.v3n2.264
Huang, Y. C. (2021). Comparison and contrast of Piaget and Vygotsky’s Theories. 7th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2021), 28–32.
Islam, K. F., Awal, A., Mazumder, H., Munni, U. R., Majumder, K., Afroz, K., Tabassum, M. N., & Hossain, M. M. (2023). Social cognitive theory-based health promotion in primary care practice: A scoping review. Heliyon, 9(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14889
Kember, D., & McNaught, C. (2007). Enhancing University teaching: Lessons from research into award-winning teachers. In Enhancing University Teaching: Lessons From Research Into Award-Winning Teachers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962947
Khoiri, A., Evalina, Komariah, N., Utami, R. T., Paramarta, V., Siswandi, Janudin, & Sunarsi, D. (2021). 4Cs analysis of 21st century skills-based school areas. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012142
Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2020). “Cognitive Apprenticeship” Revisited. American Educator, 44(3).
Lyons, K., McLaughlin, J. E., Khanova, J., & Roth, M. T. (2017). Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences education: a qualitative review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9707-4
Moinuddin, A., Goel, A., & Sethi, Y. (2021). The Role of Augmented Feedback on Motor Learning: A Systematic Review. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19695
Morris, N. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology . By Diana Laurillard . British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2012.742279
Nabavi, R. T. (2014). Bandura ’ s social learning theory & social cognitive learning theory. Theories of Developmental Psychology Title, January 2012.
Obo, E. R. (2022). The Role of Feedback in the Learning Process of Students. Journal of Educational Studies, 4(1).
Persadha, D. A. K. (2016). Studi kompetensi kemampuan menulis di kalangan mahasiswa. MUADDIB, 06(01), 1–20.
Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). The role research-based learning to enhance research and academic writing skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(3), 351–366.
Pramudiyanti, P. (2018). Kemampuan mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi menulis makalah: Sebuah refleksi diri. Jurnal Bioterdidik: Wahana Ekspresi Ilmiah, 6(3), 1–8.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. In Journal of Engineering Education (Vol. 93, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Strand, T. (2014). Experience and education. In Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words: 100 Years of Semiotics, Communication and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.5840/thought1939142141
Susiani, T. S., Salimi, M., & Hidayah, R. (2018a). Research Based Learning (RBL): how improve critical thinking skills? SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200042
Susiani, T. S., Salimi, M., & Hidayah, R. (2018b). Research Based Learning (RBL): how improve critical thinking skills? SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200042
Suteja, S., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Students’ Critical Thinking and Writing Skills in Project-Based Learning. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v1i1.5
Syazali, M., & Erfan, M. (2022a). Keterampilan menulis mahasiswa PGSD melalui implementasi template makalah sebagai pedoman penyusunan. Research and Development Journal Of Education Vol., 8(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v8i1.10255
Syazali, M., & Erfan, M. (2022b). Keterampilan menulis mahasiswa PGSD melalui implementasi template makalah sebagai pedoman penyusunan. Research and Development Journal Of Education Vol., 8(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v8i1.10255
Syazali, M., Erfan, M., & Rahmatih, A. N. (2023). Makalah hasil penelitian sains mahasiswa: bagaimana kualitasnya jika difasilitasi dengan contoh makalah? BADA’A:JurnalIlmiahPendidikanDasar, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37216/badaa.v5i1.893
Syazali, M., & Umar, U. (2022a). Implementasi template dan contoh makalah: upaya meningkatkan keterampilan menulis mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(5), 6039–6045.
Syazali, M., & Umar, U. (2022b). Implementasi template dan contoh makalah: upaya meningkatkan keterampilan menulis mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(5), 6039–6045.
Syazali, M., Widiade, I. K., Nursaptini, N., Sriwartini, N. L. P. N., & Hasnawati, H. (2020a). Evaluasi keterampilan menulis makalah pada mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 6(3), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i3.2775
Syazali, M., Widiade, I. K., Nursaptini, N., Sriwartini, N. L. P. N., & Hasnawati, H. (2020b). Evaluasi keterampilan menulis makalah pada mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 6(3), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i3.2775
Tim Penyusun. (2019). Pedoman Akademik Universitas Mataram. Mataram: Mataram University Press.
Tohir, M., Abidin, Z., Dafik, & Hobri. (2018). Students creative thinking skills in solving two dimensional arithmetic series through research- based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012072
Tricomi, E., & DePasque, S. (2016). The role of feedback in learning and motivation. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 19. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320160000019015
Usmeldi, Amini, R., & Trisna, S. (2017). The development of research-based learning model with science, environment, technology, and society approaches to improve critical thinking of students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.10680
Virginia, K., & Michael, G. (2022). Bandura’s Social Learning Theory and Its Importance in the Organizational Psychology Context. Journal of Psychology Research, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5542/2022.06.001
Wessels, I., Rueß, J., Gess, C., Deicke, W., & Ziegler, M. (2021). Is research-based learning effective? Evidence from a pre -post analysis in the social sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2595–2609. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1739014
Widodo, A., Jailani, A. K., Novitasari, S., Sutisna, D., & Erfan, M. (2020). Analisis kemampuan menulis makalah mahasiswa baru PGSD Universitas Mataram. Jurnal DIDIKA: Wahana Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, VI(1), 77–91.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Syazali, I Ketut Widiada, Aisa Nikmah Rahmatih, Hasnawati, Ilmi Solihana Hayati, Baiq Olivia Dwita Elvira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
klik di sini 
