The Effect of Cognitive Conflict Strategy on Improving Understanding of Students' Physics Concepts Reviewing from Cognitive Style
DOI:
10.29303/jipp.v7i2c.583Published:
2022-06-21Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to determine the extent of the influence of cognitive conflict strategies on students' conceptual understanding in terms of cognitive style. This research is a quasi-experimental with one group pretest-posttest design. The sample used in the research consisted of 28 students who were studying at one of the universities in the city of Mataram. There are two main instruments used in this study, (1) the concept understanding test and (2) the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT). Concept understanding tests are given before and after treatment, while GEFT is only before treatment. The test result data was then analyzed using the N-Gain calculation. The results of data analysis showed that the average creativity of physics teacher candidates increased in the moderate category (N-Gain = 0.52). Students who have FD (filed dependence) cognitive style get a higher average N-gain score (N-Gain = 0.57) when compared to students who have FI (filed independence) learning style (N-Gain = 0.48). Based on the results of the effect size calculation, it shows that the effect of differences in cognitive style on increasing students' conceptual understanding is in the medium category.
Keywords:
Cognitive conflict, concept understanding, cognitive styleReferences
Suwardana, H., (2018). Revolusi Industri 4.0 Berbasis Revolusi Mental. JATI UNIK : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik dan Manajemen Industri, 1 (2). 109-118. Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/235152255.pdf
Fajariah, M. & Suryo, D., (2020). Sejarah Revolusi Industri di Inggris Pada Tahun 1760–1830. HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, 8 (1). 77-94. Doi: 10.24127/hj.v8i1.2214
Hikmawati & Sutrio (2019). Miskonsepsi dalam Fisika. Selong: Garuda Ilmu.
Santrock, John W., (2014). Psikologi Pendidikan Edisi 5 Buku 2. Terjemahan Harya Bhimasena. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Anderson, Lorin, W. dan David R. K. (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Assessmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar
Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar Mata Pelajaran Matematika SD/MI. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Blizak, D., Chafiqi, F., & Kendil, D. (2009). Students misconceptions about light in Algeria. In Education and Training in Optics and Photonics (p. EMA5). Optical Society of America. Retrieved from: https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=ETOP-2009-EMA5
Suparno, & Paul. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Jamaris, M. (2015). Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pendidikan. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia
Sanjaya, W., (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta : Prenada Media Group
Dahar, R.W., (2011). Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga
Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34, 71-96. Retrieved from:https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.469.686&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Foster, C. (2011). A slippery slope: Resolving cognitive conflict in mechanics. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 30, 216-221. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrr015
Sirait, J., (2010). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Konflik Kognitif Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa SMA Pada Topik Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 1 (2). 26-34. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v1i2.197
Baser, M. (2006). Fostering Conceptual Change by Cognitive Conflict Based Instruction on Studen’s Understanding of Heat and Temperature Concepts. Eurasia Jurnal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2 (2), 96-114. Retrieved from : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.9605&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Setyowari A., Subali, B., & Mosik, (2011). Implementasi Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Smp Kelas VIII. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 7 (). 89-96. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v7i2.1078
Zuhdi, M., & Makhrus, M., (2020). Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Dasar Melalui Konflik Kognitif dengan Pertanyaan Tak Terduga. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT), 6 (2), 264-269. Doi: 10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2121
Frankel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. Hyun dan Hellen, H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sugiyono, (2012). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta
Hake, R. R. (1999). analyzing change/gain scores. American Educational Research Association. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/ AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf.
Busyairi, A., & Sinaga, P., (2015). Strategi Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (Cps) Berbasis Eksperimen Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 6(1):133. Doi: 10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.576
Ulya, H., (2015). Hubungan Gaya Kognitif dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan
Masalah Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Konseling GUSJIGANG, 1(2): 2460-1187. Doi: 10.24176/jkg.v1i2.410
Lu, H.K., & Lin, P.C., (2018). A Study on the Effect of Cognitive Style in the Field of STEM on Collaborative Learning Outcome. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(3):194-198. Doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.3.1032
Hewson, D. W., & Hewson, M. G. (1984). The Role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1-13. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00051837
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (1); 3-15. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10023
Chou, H. W. (2001). Influences of cognitive style and training method on training effectiveness. Computers & Education, 37 (1); 11-25. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.462.6699
Alomyan, H. (2004). Individual differences: Implications for web-based learning design. International Education Journal, 4(4), 188-196. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ903824
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
klik di sini 
